Journal statistics

The archive of journals contains 719 items in 145 categories. To date, these have been downloaded 725,754 times.

How to use the archive

When the cursor changes from an arrow to a pointing finger, it indicates a link that you may click on to select that item.

The blue buttons at the top can be selected to return to the overview or to run a search for specific information.

Most volumes have been split into two parts, each with separate articles. When you select a specific number, all of the articles will be listed with details of the author, date of publication, language and the size of the file that will be downloaded if you choose that option. Just click on the yellow "Download" button to transfer a copy of the article to your own computer or device.

Download details
Lexical Verbs Expressing Modality in Bantu Language: The Case of Runyambo and Lug Lexical Verbs Expressing Modality in Bantu Language: The Case of Runyambo and Luguru

Abstract

This paper provides novel documentation and description of the verbal modal system in Great Lakes Bantu languages. Runyambo (E21/JE21) is compared with Luguru (G35). The paper builds on Bostoen et al. (2012) and Kawalya et al. (2014, 2018) to revisit Runyambo data and add data from Luguru to re-examine findings in the Great Lakes Bantu Languages. This study is the first to discuss necessity modality in Rutara languages and the very first description of modality in Luguru. The study was conducted in Karagwe and Kyerwa Districts of Kagera Region and Morogoro Rural and Mvomero Districts in Morogoro Region. The field work that involved 10 informants included collection of written texts and in-depth dialogues and interviews for collecting oral texts. The study presents the modal baas- ‘be able’ as the only modal verb for expressing possibility in Runyambo language. Moreover, the modal baas- in Runyambo as opposed to dah- ‘be able/capable/permitted’ in Luguru, has both modal and lexical functions. We demonstrate further that the modal verb teekw- ‘must/ought to’ is used to express both weak and strong necessity in Runyambo. The modal teekw- modifies all verb types and it requires the auxiliary verb to either refer to the past or future. The modal verbs dah- ‘be able/capable/permitted’ and bamigw- ‘must/ought to’ in Luguru express possibility and necessity respectively. It is fascinating to identify that in both languages the modal verb for necessity requires both progressive formative and subjunctive form of the immediate verb. Lastly, we demonstrate that in the two languages the modal verbs interact with different tense and aspect formatives.

Data
Created 2020-Dec-11
Changed 2020-Dec-15
Size 319.61 KB
Author This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
MD5 Checksum bf43a27903ad86097cad307253d73a78
Created by Hasiyatu Abubakari
Changed by Hasiyatu Abubakari
Downloads 583
SHA1 Checksum b7f67c5d937f0bef337a5001fb6dbabfac92e553
Save
Cookies user preferences
We use cookies to ensure you to get the best experience on our website. If you decline the use of cookies, this website may not function as expected.
Accept all
Decline all
Analytics
Tools used to analyze the data to measure the effectiveness of a website and to understand how it works.
Google Analytics
Accept
Decline
Unknown
Google Analytics
Accept
Decline
Google Analytics
Accept
Decline
Functional
Tools used to give you more features when navigating on the website, this can include social sharing.
PHP.net
Accept
Decline